Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (209179)	12/1/2006 5:31:08 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

you claimed it was republicans, I showed where you were wrong

To: jttmab who wrote (209179)	12/1/2006 5:41:04 PM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

That idiot is talking (it's like the inane Pelosi baloney--they do not have anything else) about the Clinton ILA, the Iraq Liberation Act. Republicans refuse to read the one-pager available everywhere on the web. They do, however, claim that all of Bush's stupidity, Rumsfeld's incompetence and Republican military failures in Iraq are Clinton's fault because he advocated the use of about $90 million to promote democracy in Iraq. The lazy dolts refuse to read the act which didn't call for an invasion and permanent occupation for the purpose of war profiteering and oil price gouging. The act called for the support of those organizations promoting democracy in Iraq. That dolt's use of this strawman over and over and over and over again simply shows the rightwing's utter moral and intellectual (not much there to begin with anyway) collapse. It's simply the Republican blame-Clinton, blame-anyone game. They want to share the blame with anyone who isn't running fast enough away from them but they refuse to share their war profiteering blood money.