Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RetiredNow who wrote (312403)	11/26/2006 6:38:25 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572362

What amazes me is that so many, otherwise intelligent, people can be flatly denying what the majority of scientists around the world are saying You should look at the history of those who denied that smoking caused cancer, and how long some of them hung in there. Same story I'm afraid.

To: RetiredNow who wrote (312403)	11/26/2006 7:01:21 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572362

mindmeld, I find your persistence admirable.

To: RetiredNow who wrote (312403)	11/26/2006 10:12:26 PM
From: Taro	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572362

Yes, mindmeld that is true and I am also very familiar with the results from those deep drill ice cores from both Arctic and Antarctic. Talking about the recent 17 years, however, it also happens to be a fact that the worldwide average temperatures were on a serious decline for the 30 years period prior to that. As you said yourself in your previous post, nobody can make any serious conclusions based on the measurements of the last 50 or even 100 years. And before that, how accurate do you believe temperatures were checked? Be realistic, my friend.