Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougSF30 who wrote (217671)	11/27/2006 1:57:25 PM
From: aleph0	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

You are both in violation of the rules of this board. If we removed all the continually looping threads about "who said what", we'd reduce the traffic by half IMO ! Just an observation !

To: dougSF30 who wrote (217671)	11/27/2006 2:08:59 PM
From: Not a Short	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

How is it in violation of the rules to show that you are contradicting prior statements made on the same account? Do you deny making contradictory statements? If not would you like to explain the change of opinion?

To: dougSF30 who wrote (217671)	11/27/2006 5:12:29 PM
From: Rink	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Doug, In the absence of your explanation on how your two viewpoints can be married I can only agree that you changed your bias about the fact that the Japanese antitrust authorities found Intel in violation of the antitrust law, proposed remedies, and Intel accepted them without admitting wrongdoing. So there was a cause (your seemingly two diverging viewpoints), Mas and Brush exaggerated the issue (I advise you guys to quite while I have not acted yet), and you call foul instead of explaining yourself. I propose that you (Doug) don't explain yourself now, and that we all stop talking this into another waterfall of OT and more or less big insults. Regards, Rink