SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taro who wrote (312745)11/28/2006 9:28:11 AM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572264
 
Nope. That can be determined easily by any statistician worth his salt. That's science, not conjecture.



To: Taro who wrote (312745)11/28/2006 9:49:16 AM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572264
 
"That said the problem remains, that so far nobody knows what comes first, the temperatures or the CO2!"

Well, do you dispute that CO2 absorbs in the infrared? Because to believe that increasing the level of CO2 in the atmosphere does not cause warming, it would require that CO2 not absorb in the infrared.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News