SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dash of Reality who wrote (146644)11/28/2006 7:01:56 PM
From: slacker711  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Excellent question... Given that QC has stated that the impact to the bottom line is only $0.04 to $0.06 per share, I would have to assume that they will accrue revenue. From an accounting stand point I believe that they would be required to accrue for the amount of revenue (percent of royalty) that Nokia has agreed to in their negotiations. This would be the minimum amount of revenue (worst case scenario) that would be received from Nokia.

I was actually thinking of it the other way....will Qualcomm account for possible payments to Nokia? One of the more popular scenarios has Nokia continuing to pay the current royalty rate but Qualcomm now paying Nokia for use of their IP. A back-handed way of giving Nokia a discount. I have no idea how likely this needs to be before it needs to show up in the accounting.

Slacker



To: Dash of Reality who wrote (146644)11/28/2006 8:44:44 PM
From: manalagi  Respond to of 152472
 
The net amount that Nokia will be owing QCOM will be significant. With the interest rate as it is, Nokia will just be getting interest free loan from QCOM, unless of course there is a provision of interest accrued from royalties in arrears. Any default provision?