Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gulo who wrote (11137)	11/29/2006 2:01:43 AM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 38174

G, the concern per Mr. Harper and Flaherty was Bell, possibly the banks etc... . a cascading effect.. A simple NO MORE was all that was needed. No more no less. Problem solved. Integrity intact, speculators burned (Oh well), promise kept. How hard was that ? Is that too much to ask ? No matter how much Harper does well now I will not forget that. It will always nag me. And I lost nothing ! I know I should expect nothing from politicians and would like a lot less of them... Libertarian ? yeah centre-left.. A few issues pull me a bit to the right .. Trusts have bounced back... they , say a Canetic for example is fairly valued taking into consideration the future tax hit and a payout of say 10-12 %. Personally I wouldn't risk my dough for that kinda return in an energy trust which is why I was all out a long time, and too soon :O) So I think they are still too pricey.. mostly ... I bought some Thunder. A 26% yield is worth a gamble..