SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (313039)11/29/2006 5:34:16 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577195
 
Forcibly? When did I say that?

How else do you remove a supreme leader that doesn't want to leave? Force doesn't imply violence, ya know. The voters forced the Republican majority out of office. Philippinos forced Marcos from office in the 1980's. Just glad to hear you agree that removing incompetent supreme leaders who are doing lots of harm is a good thing - we're on the same page on that one (don't get too upset....).



To: Alighieri who wrote (313039)11/29/2006 5:06:23 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577195
 
Defense eyeing more deployments to Iraq By PAULINE JELINEK, Associated Press Writer
21 minutes ago


The Pentagon is developing plans to send four more battalions to Iraq early next year, partly to boost security in Baghdad, defense officials said Wednesday. Meanwhile, a commission studying Iraq policy said it would make its report next week.

The extra combat engineer battalions of reserves, likely to be sent to Baghdad, would total about 3,500 troops, officials said. They said the units, coming from around the United States, have already done tours in Iraq but there has been no final decision on which will go.

The moves come as violence continues to rise in Baghdad, and President Bush is under growing pressure to craft an exit strategy that would withdraw a substantial number of U.S. troops from Iraq while shifting more responsibility to the Iraqi government. The Iraq Study Group, a bipartisan commission looking into Iraq war policy, said it will release its report to the president, Congress and the public on Dec. 6.

The commission, led by former Secretary of State James A. Baker III and former Rep. Lee Hamilton, D-Ind., is widely expected to call for regional talks as part of its recommendations, including involvement by Syria and Iran. The Bush administration has been reluctant to engage those two countries, which it says have abetted the violence in Iraq.

It remained unclear what the group would recommend regarding possible U.S. troop withdrawals. As of Tuesday, its members — five Democrats and five Republicans — were divided over the appropriate U.S. troop levels in Iraq, and whether and how to pull American forces out, according to one official close to the panel's deliberations.

A second official has said that the commission is unlikely to propose a timetable for withdrawing all U.S. troops but that some members seem to favor setting a date for an initial withdrawal, an idea that has been pushed by many congressional Democrats.

There are 139,000 U.S. troops in Iraq, with some 20,000 in and around Baghdad.

At a Pentagon press conference, Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, would not say whether more troops are planned for Baghdad, but he did say that was among many ideas commanders are debating. He said there was no plan to shift all troops out of the volatile Anbar Province into Baghdad.

Pace was asked if the advice of generals is becoming less important because of the upcoming Iraq Study Group report and the fact that power in Congress has shifted to Democrats, some of whom have been critical of the war.

"This is a very complex problem, and the more 10-pound brains we can bring to bear on the problem for our nation, the better," Pace said.

The Pentagon's decisions on which reserve battalions to send to Iraq next year would depend on how long the units had already served on the battlefront, because the Pentagon is trying to not break a policy of deploying troops no longer than 24 months on the ground in Iraq. The decision-making process was described by defense officials who requested anonymity because the plans have not yet been announced.

In addition, military leaders are shifting brigades within Iraq. The officials said they are moving a Stryker Brigade into Baghdad to help shore up security there. The 3rd Stryker Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division will move from Mosul in northern Iraq, down to Baghdad to replace a Stryker brigade that has gone home to Alaska.

Portions of the 2nd Brigade, 1st Infantry Division are moving into Iraq and heading up to Mosul to take its place, officials said.

In another development, former CIA Director Robert Gates, President Bush's nominee for defense secretary, endorsed the idea of engaging Iran and Syria for help in stabilizing increasingly violent Iraq, an opinion somewhat at odds with Bush's.

Gates made the comments in response to a questionnaire from the Senate Armed Services Committee, which is to hold a confirmation hearing next week.

"War planning should be done with the understanding that post-major combat phase of operations can be crucial," Gates said in a 65-page written response submitted to the committee Tuesday.

"If confirmed, I intend to improve the department's capabilities in this area," he said. "With the advantage of hindsight, I might have done some things differently."

Gates also appeared to subtly criticize the invasion of Iraq.

"I believe the use of pre-emptive force should be based on very strong evidence," he said.

___

Associated Press Writer Lolita C. Baldor contributed to this story.