Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scion who wrote (807)	11/29/2006 8:41:43 AM
From: rrufff	Respond to of 1681

The reading of the allegations against the former lawyer more likely raise questions about the lawyer's activities and that this an attempt to deflect, given the unflattering picture of Petar in the newspaper and his admitted screw-ups as former CEO.

To: scion who wrote (807)	11/30/2006 10:35:53 PM
From: Jim Bishop	Respond to of 1681

We need to look at the detailed reasons for the tribunal's decision which I understand makes things clearer about Cameila and Petar. I hope to get it later today or tomorrow. It can be ordered for free.

To: scion who wrote (807)	12/1/2006 12:20:27 AM
From: Jim Bishop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1681

Regarding Cameila and the tribunal decision. It's 29 pages long and the Law Society of Upper Canada will fax it to you on request. Or you can phone the hearings co-ordinator at 416-947-5289. I don't want to read 29 pages of it. I'll take it on good authority from one who has a copy that it goes into significant detail on Petar's involvement. There is no absolute proof that he forged the cheque, but he did deposit it. It sounds like she might have a good case if she wanted to take it to a civil court fight.