To: Stephen O who wrote (11141 ) 11/29/2006 5:05:12 PM From: Ichy Smith Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 38191 Stephen, you wonder why I am upset over Caledonia. Perhaps this bill should be passed over to BC to pay on it's own, like Ontario is paying for Caledonia. I certainly have no problem with this becoming a bill for BC to take over instead of making all of us cover it. A U D I T O R - G E N E R A L’ S R E P O RT Spending abuses revealed Nov. 29, 2006 National Post Talks with B.C. natives near $1BOttawa, which began formal treaty negotiations with B.C. native bands in 1993, will have spent around $1-billion by 2009 and likely have only three finalized agreements, the Auditor-General reported. That projected total represents a tiny fraction of the 202 First Nation bands in B.C. eligible to participate in the process, which has so far cost federal taxpayers more than $700-million and hasn’t produced a single final treaty, according to the report. The original federal plan when the process began was to resolve all B.C. land claims by 2000. “The government needs to rethink its strategies based on a realistic timeline,” the Auditor-General said in a news release. While the federal government is close to bringing three treaties to Parliament, Shelia Fraser paints a bleak outlook. “Progress continues to be slow and there is a risk that the treaty process, as it exists today, may be overtaken by the changing legal, economic and political environments in which the negotiations are taking place,” she stated in a joint letter to the federal and B.C. parliaments with B.C. Auditor-General Arn van Iersel. “At this point, we believe that signing treaties with most B.C. First Nations based on the treaty process as it currently exists continue to be difficult.” Peter O’Neil, CanWest News Service