Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: heinz44 who wrote (26625)	11/30/2006 1:23:14 PM
From: loantech	Respond to of 78430

Heinz44, I have read good things about pax in the past but do not follow it now. Maybe howy owns this one. You may ask him. Some of the others here may be able to answer your assay question. Thanks, Tom

To: heinz44 who wrote (26625)	11/30/2006 1:48:30 PM
From: onepath	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78430

"My question regarding that play is how can you continuously come up with assays greater than 9gm/t and call it "nugget effect" and cut them way back. Whats the chance of always hitting nuggets??" Read it and understand your point.Very improbable.I am going to take a close look at CDY. LYM...Right close to were I live and I did own it.(this spring)Always thought they had great props. with good partners but never seemed to get any recognition.Guess I needed more patience. PAX Surely its day is coming. Have a few JAG.wts and it looks like a takeover is coming.

To: heinz44 who wrote (26625)	11/30/2006 1:51:05 PM
From: hank2010	Respond to of 78430

"My question regarding that play is how can you continuously come up with assays greater than 9gm/t and call it "nugget effect" and cut them way back. Whats the chance of always hitting nuggets?? That is standard procedure in the industry, Heinz. If we are going to judge all the players by the same criteria, they all have to follow the standards. Explanation: It has to do with statistics. I am do not have the time/smarts to give you a detailed explanation. Layman explanation: For 9 gm/t we are dealing with 9 parts per million. In a lottery, if the first time ticket buyer wins the jackpot would you bet that he would hit the jackpot again for the next 50 weks by buying another ticket in each of the next 50 weeks lotteries? Or even in 10 of the next 50 weeks lotteries? Maybe russet, or nevada or sagey or EC or others could give you the professional explanation. I think the edzedblog page is being written by someone with very litle experience in the business! I get the feeling you are asking questions of the board in an attempt at a soft pump. I replied to your previous posts about your Guinea co. So far IMO, the deposit is too small to merit the high company capitalization. You disagree! That's fine, that's what makes a market. But instead of refuting my arguments/opinion you refer me to a blog where the writer is not even familiar with the "nugget effect". In my case, anyways, it is getting to be "too much trouble ....to take a few minutes to read"