Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nash363 who wrote (878)	11/30/2006 3:11:50 PM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1681

Hi, sorry to hear of your troubles and thanks for coming back. I left you a series of questions and requests for clarification. Message 23051466 thanks in advance

To: Nash363 who wrote (878)	11/30/2006 3:48:56 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1681

Welocome back Cameila, and thanks for the clarification. I hope you noticed that your account has 10 free posts per day. You said - Furthermore this machinery was sold (from what I was told) to the payor company. The cheque was made to me In Trust. It was 2 days later that one of the principals of the company was checking his bank and noticed the debit of $143,800 from his bank. The cheque was not a deposit cheque but a petty cash cheque to one of the directors of the payor. The cheque (original) has been produced. PV will say he lost his machinery but I am very skeptical of that position. I find the whole episode bizarre. How could anyone expect a $143, 800 transaction not to be noticed? Was it in Canadian or US funds? Do you recall the name of the payor for the petty cash cheque, and the name of the company involved? Do you recall what type of machinery was involved?