SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: AlfaNut who wrote (146715)11/30/2006 8:31:35 PM
From: Q8tfreebe  Respond to of 152472
 
Your analysis is Spot on !!



To: AlfaNut who wrote (146715)12/1/2006 7:04:46 AM
From: edwin k.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
You are correct in that NOK doesn't care about the royalties all that much, and that they would still be fighting at 3%. What NOK wants is to derail QUALCOMM from becoming the King of the Hill in the wireless space. This had been NOK's space for many years, and with Q rapidly gaining on them for this real estate, there is a real sense of fear. The only way they can stop Q is to get dirty, and get everybody / anybody else they can to join the "good" fight. They just do not know what else to do. Trust me, this is really the motivation. All this talk about royalty rates has no meaning except how it is perceived and plays out in litigation processes.
e.k.



To: AlfaNut who wrote (146715)12/1/2006 1:36:16 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
What Nokia cares about is what it pays in royalties relative to its direct competition.

Hmmm. If that's true, then Nokia will have a hard time convincing the European regulators that approving what Nokia wants is tantamount to giving Nokia the kind of unfair advantage that Nokia accuses QCOM of creating.

Nokia, it seems to me, would have a very weak argument if they tried that stunt.

Art