Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dash of Reality who wrote (146728)	12/1/2006 10:32:31 AM
From: manalagi	Respond to of 152472

IJ already said that QCOM investors are sticking with the company in its legal fight, even though it costs 100 million this year and an additional 100 million next year. QCOM board of directors has not make any noise about the stock performance, so it seems that IJ statement reflects the entire board's position.

To: Dash of Reality who wrote (146728)	12/1/2006 11:40:40 AM
From: John Carragher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

The rules say all is fair in business. i disagree.

To: Dash of Reality who wrote (146728)	12/1/2006 12:25:29 PM
From: DWB	Respond to of 152472

I was faced with a similar quandry back in the late 90's... I owned a large amount of ERICY ADRs and had made a pretty penny on them, while QCOM languished. Amidst all the second generation warfare, I took a good look at what the European countries were saying/doing, and what QCOM was. Despite the fact that they were looking out for their/my interests as they thought best, I decided that QCOM was actually right in their arguments, and thought that they would eventually prevail. Luckily, I acted on that, and moved all my ERICY money into QCOM before the runup...