Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (953)	12/1/2006 2:08:02 PM
From: Star the Wonder Pup	Respond to of 1681

Sure you can, rruff. With penny scams you are 99.9% correct if you assume the ceo and anybody associated with him/her is a crook.

To: rrufff who wrote (953)	12/1/2006 2:20:01 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1681

You can't just holler "looks like a fraud, someone had something to gain, so he must be guilty." No, I am saying PV is, IMO, a prime suspect in what a bank has confirmed was a fraudulent transaction. You turned my speculation, my raising of a red flag, into a platitude-- that I was implying PV "must be guilty". Turning things into platitudes is a bad habit on message boards, which are all about speculation. For example, "I just want to know the truth." Platitude. "I think we need to hear both sides." Platitude. "Why can't we all just get along." And so on. If want a few more, let me call a few politicians I know. - Jeff