Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (12075)	12/2/2006 4:41:12 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218753

TJ, I thought the answer is quite obvious<<<....The price of oil is high, so profits for Exxon, etc are very high>> ... and how is that good?<> Profits for Exxon [and other oil merchants] being high is excellent for their shareholders and other "stake-holders". Shareholders like to get lots of money. I'm sure you know that. Which isn't to say that everyone is happy. The nature of good things is that they are often not good for somebody else. Every silver lining has a cloud. I was explaining how there are many ways to view the WAT, in particular in Iraq, as being a success. Mqurice

To: TobagoJack who wrote (12075)	12/2/2006 10:16:04 AM
From: foundation	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218753

re: you just demonstrated you know nothing ---------- J - do not make Americans, even expatriates, look in the mirror... ... reflections of a reality-based world view are entirely taboo. We prefer our illusions, and forcing others to accept our self-serving distortions. When no longer possible, we'll simply turn the planet to glass... and blame it on everyone but ourselves.