Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (8400)	12/3/2006 12:03:08 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 36918

seems like they get money from a lot of places, like the BSers pushing GW down our throats, just whores looking for grant money

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (8400)	12/3/2006 12:04:53 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 36918

Seems like you just attack the messengers against GW and not the one's for GW, why is that, Comrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (8400)	12/3/2006 12:17:20 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 36918

are these paid shills also ? In 2001, the National Academy of Sciences report made clear that, "Because there is considerable uncertainty in current understanding of how the climate system varies naturally and reacts to emissions... current estimates... of future warming should be regarded as tentative and subject to future adjustment (either upward or downward)." This is absolute clarity that our understanding of the climate system is insufficient to make predictions that are credible enough support such far reaching regulation.