SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LTK007 who wrote (13478)12/3/2006 7:51:56 PM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 22250
 
Baathists demand U.S. exit from Iraq

SALAH NASRAWI
Associated Press

DAMASCUS, Syria - A man claiming to be the top spokesman for Iraq's former ruling party said the group will not stop aiding the insurgency or engage in national reconciliation efforts unless the U.S.-backed government in Baghdad accepts conditions that would lead to its end.

Among the demands are the complete withdrawal of American troops, the abolition of laws enacted since the ouster of Saddam Hussein's regime and trials of all Iraqis who cooperated with the United States and the U.S.-supported administration.

Neither the United States nor Iraq's Shiite Muslim-led government has shown any willingness to make such broad concessions to the Sunni Arab-dominated insurgents. President Bush has said he will keep U.S. troops in Iraq until the Baghdad government can keep the peace.

But the comments in the interview late last week illustrate the thinking of some Sunni Arab hard-liners. The meeting came after repeated efforts by The Associated Press to make contact in Syria with Saddam's Baath party loyalists and other supporters of the insurgency in Iraq.

The man, who appeared in person at the interview, gave himself the nom de guerre Abu Mohammed but has been identified as Khudair al-Murshidi, a former head of the Iraqi Doctors Syndicate under Saddam. He refused to give his real name or be photographed, although he - like many others associated with Saddam's regime - appeared to be moving freely around Damascus.

Saying he was in Syria while on his way to other Mideast countries to advance the party's goals, Abu Mohammed said he was official spokesman for the Iraqi Regional Command of the Baath. He said it is headed by Izzat Ibrahim, Saddam's former vice president and a fugitive with a $10 million bounty on his head who is thought to be the top leader of Saddam loyalists.

Other Baathist sympathizers and party members interviewed in Damascus, where many of them now live, confirmed the man's position and helped to arrange the interview. Al-Murshidi also appeared last month on Al-Jazeera television using the pseudonym Abu Mohammed.

He would not detail his exact connections to the insurgency but said the party's relations with insurgents were "through either direct command of some of the groups, or direct guidance or direct coordination."

He acknowledged that Arab regimes, Iraqis "and other friends" are pushing Sunni hard-liners to join reconciliation talks, but added: "We have made it clear that this is not a picnic. The Americans did not take a simple thing from us ... they have stolen our country and killed our people."

In discussing the strict conditions demanded of the U.S.-backed government in Iraq, Abu Mohammed also said his group considered the trials of Saddam in Baghdad to be illegal and the verdicts null.

Still, he did not include any demand that Saddam be restored to power.

He said the Baath party had committed mistakes during Saddam's rule. "No sane man can deny this. But the leadership of the party has started a revision of the past to draw lessons that will help rebuild Iraq," he said.

Abu Mohammed conceded Baathists had not been able to reorganize the party everywhere in Iraq, especially in the south where Shiites hold sway, and he was critical of Iranian influence inside Iraq, blaming the U.S. occupation for that.

Yet he said Baath loyalists would be willing to build relations with Washington once what he called a legitimate government in Iraq was restored.

The interview came at a time when Saddam's followers are taking steps to regroup and regain political influence outside Iraq. They have been increasingly outspoken in recent weeks, apparently in an effort to blunt efforts by other Sunni Arabs, encouraged by the United States and neighboring Arab regimes, to reach some deal with Iraq's Shiite-led government.

U.S. officials have said they believe Iraq's insurgency is made up of both Saddam loyalists, such as the former Baathists, and foreign Islamic extremist terrorists with broad al-Qaida links.

The Bush administration and Iraqi government allege that Syria allows men and money to flow across its territory to the insurgency - accusations Syria denies. Damascus has generally refused to comment on specific foreign activists inside its borders.

Saddam's Baath party was generally a nationalistic, secular party before the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, and in the interview Abu Mohammed suggested the group retained much of that character.

He described what he called "a big difference" between Saddam loyalists and the insurgency's al-Qaida-linked elements, which he said considered Baathists to be atheists.

"Our program is to liberate Iraq ... We are fighting the Americans because they have occupied Iraq, while al-Qaida has a different program. They want to kill the Americans in Washington and anywhere in the world," he said.

contracostatimes.com



To: LTK007 who wrote (13478)12/3/2006 11:43:59 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22250
 
Muhammad Yunis al-Ahmed.

yahoo search:

search.yahoo.com



time.com

Sunday, Sep. 18, 2005
Saddam's Revenge
The secret history of U.S. mistakes, misjudgments and intelligence failures that let the Iraqi dictator and his allies launch an insurgency now ripping Iraq apart
By JOE KLEIN

Five men met in an automobile in a baghdad park a few weeks after the fall of Saddam Hussein's Baathist regime in April 2003, according to U.S. intelligence sources. One of the five was Saddam. The other four were among his closest advisers. The agenda: how to fight back against the U.S.-led occupation of Iraq. A representative of Saddam's former No. 2, Izzat Ibrahim al-Duri, was there. But the most intriguing man in the car may have been a retired general named Muhammad Yunis al-Ahmed, who had been a senior member of the Military Bureau, a secret Baath Party spy service. The bureau's job had been to keep an eye on the Iraqi military—and to organize Baathist resistance in the event of a coup. Now a U.S. coup had taken place, and Saddam turned to al-Ahmed and the others and told them to start "rebuilding your networks."
The 45-minute meeting was pieced together months later by U.S. military intelligence. It represents a rare moment of clarity in the dust storm of violence that swirls through central Iraq. The insurgency has grown well beyond its initial Baathist core to include religious extremist and Iraqi nationalist organizations, and plain old civilians who are angry at the American occupation. But Saddam's message of "rebuilding your networks" remains the central organizing principle.
--

---
What is remarkable is the extent to which the U.S. is aware of al-Ahmed's activities. "We know where Muhammad Yunis al-Ahmed lives in Damascus," says a U.S. intelligence official. "We know his phone number. He believes he has the protection of the Syrian government, and that certainly seems to be the case." But he hasn't been aggressively pursued by the U.S. either—in part because there has been a persistent and forlorn hope that al-Ahmed might be willing to help negotiate an end to the Baathist part of the insurgency. A senior U.S. intelligence officer says that al-Ahmed was called at least twice by former Prime Minister Iyad Allawi—an old acquaintance—and that a representative of an "other government agency," a military euphemism that usually means the CIA, "knocked on his door in 2004 and asked if he was willing to talk. He wasn't."

========

Any nation, in risk of being (attacked and) occuped has (a couple of) plans and people responsible, trained for handling a possible occupation.