Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (12139)	12/4/2006 9:34:35 AM
From: foundation	Respond to of 218039

re: Q and cheap intellectual property ---------- ... as goes "globalization" (read US global hegemony of resources and markets)... ... so goes the sanctity and value of (especially US) patents... If I were Q, I wouldn't include China TD-SCDMA patent royalties in future earnings just yet... ... and aside from lapdog Great Britain, Europe may simply define down, down, down what is "fair and reasonable"... At the very least, however, Q will still have a curvy, aesthetically appealing patent wall at Corporate...

To: elmatador who wrote (12139)	12/4/2006 6:38:35 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218039

QCOM has been dead for as long as Maurice and I had been chatting about it finance.yahoo.com , and he in effect admitted so explicitly Message 22010666