Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (313815)	12/5/2006 12:15:20 AM
From: Elroy	Respond to of 1574059

Pretty much. The only power in the UN is in the security council, and they are divided on Iraq. Hell, the "coalition of the willing" is no longer willing. I'd say they were divided on Iraq prior to the invasion, a few years ago. God knows what the Security Council's thoughts are on Iraq today - they haven't had any resolutions about it , or perhaps even public discussion about it, for as long as I can remember. You got any bright ideas? Of course! If the "international community" wants to avoid civil war in Iraq, they should flood the country with UN peacekeepers and replace the coalition troops - play the same role that the UN played in the Balkans. If the "international community" doesn't give a damn about Iraq they should do what they are doing - nothing. Those are the two obvious options for what the "international community" should do from today in Iraq.