Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Buckey who wrote (1013)	12/4/2006 3:01:18 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1681

I agree, the 'summary' version given by Cameila Anderson and the LSCU tribunal version match very well. I think she was badly let down by the police fraud squad investigation, right at the beginning of her travails.

To: Buckey who wrote (1013)	12/4/2006 3:04:41 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1681

Here's the part I'm trying to reconcile: 8. On or about May 5, 2000, Mr. Vucicevich informed the Member he would be depositing $150,000.00 to her trust account. On the strength of this information, $15,000.00 was transferred from trust in payment of the Member's fees, and approximately $30,000.00 was transferred in trust funds were paid to Mr. Vucicevich's creditors [sic]. However, the $150,000.00 deposit was not made at that time. A conduct application (CN05/03) was issued in relation to these transfers. The Member raised the defence that the funds were transferred without the Member's instructions, and that the transfers were only discovered by her several weeks later. This defence was investigated by the Law Society, and in light of the Law Society's investigation, authorization to withdraw CN05/03 was successfully sought from PAC, and the conduct application was subsequently abandoned. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it appear the Law Society did indeed confirm that somehow someone other than Cameila was able to transfer money out of her trust account without her approval and knowledge (the latter coming two weeks later). But if money was transfered to pay her fees, how could she not know about it, unless, obviously, she never got that money. But if she never got that money, how would anyone know where it was earmarked? - Jeff