Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc. (Bulls Board) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: weff who wrote (1307)	12/5/2006 1:25:01 PM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1521

LOL - weff, not the type of question I like to answer because then the "critics" (and NASD fined and suspended worms) will say I'm pumping, because I post my opinion. I'm about 1000 posts behind on IHub so I haven't formed an opinion really. I'm holding basically at this price because, for me, the risk/reward at .015 is something with which I can live. If it's a total scam, I know my downside. If it isn't, and if they come through with AF's, then we can talk multi-bagger returns again. Just my opinion though LOL. On the one hand, I feel better that the people who went have found more than is typically available for pink pennies. On the other hand, the company raised expectations that they would file AF's and, until they do that, everything is conjecture, with the bashers tripping over themselves trying to highlight negative sentences, word by word, in each post. Of course, the mere presence of all these "round the clock good samaritans," raises the issues of what they do for a living. Again, there are plenty of legitimate issues to raise and I believe the visitors to the company raised them. That's why you have to question the motives of people who go beyond that and spend time trying to find that "manure" that just may stick to the wall or who attack others for merely being positive.