SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: plantlife who wrote (218973)12/5/2006 1:25:50 PM
From: muzosiRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
the comparison was against the same size cache part.



To: plantlife who wrote (218973)12/5/2006 1:31:01 PM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
The cache was not reduced, it remained the same.

I think the shrink factor is consistent with the delays and lack of performance gain.

Again, this is all premised on the Inq being correct about the new 65nm die size being ~125mm^2 (down from 183mm^2 for 90nm)

One would've expected something like 105mm^2 with a good shrink factor of ~.58


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News