Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: smooth2o who wrote (219183)	12/5/2006 9:38:03 PM
From: muzosi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

if i traced the thread correctly cj only talks about passive cooling vs active cooling. you seem to be the one claiming that $5 worth of power is not important. i don't see where he claims it is.

To: smooth2o who wrote (219183)	12/5/2006 9:57:31 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

"Huh? Message 23074349 Besides, calling me a "weasel" is against the rules...consider yourself reported... end of discussion with you." I said nothing about 24/7. I did point out some important design considerations that power can mean. You keep throwing up a straw man and pretending that is my position. You are the one who is going around labeling other people's posts as "dumb". I guess you think you found a clever way around the rules. So now we have to deal with someone who is looking for loopholes to insult others. Hence the "weasel".

To: smooth2o who wrote (219183)	12/6/2006 8:21:05 AM
From: Rink	Respond to of 275872

Smooth, No. You did try to weasel yourself out of the argument CJ tried to make. A couple of times in fact. First time it can be called misinterpretation, but not the next. So 'liar' in the narrow context it was used in was appropriate - the arguments were provided. Also you started the insults (with your wrong dumbest post claim) and CJ was polite the first few posts after that. So next time be more polite yourself. The others do really deserve that. Discussion closed. CJ, This is not nit picking: You would have better served the board by using 'That is a plain lie' instead of 'liar', and 'are you going to weasel out on me again?' instead of 'now I know what kind of weasel you are' or something similar. Especially 'what kind of weasel' was the edge really because it can be meant in a broader sense than it needed to be (outside the scope or your discussion with him). In hind sight I think you know this. Do make this thinking yours. It's not just a detail and I'm not going to remind you forever. No discussion on this board. Use the OT board, PM, or email (address provided with speed limit post). Regards, Rink