SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (83737)12/6/2006 2:40:59 AM
From: Crimson Ghost  Respond to of 173976
 
Media Sham for Iraq War -- It's Happening Again
by Norman Solomon

The lead-up to the invasion of Iraq has become notorious in the annals of American journalism. Even many reporters, editors and commentators who fueled the drive to war in 2002 and early 2003 now acknowledge that major media routinely tossed real journalism out the window in favor of boosting war.

But it's happening again.

The current media travesty is a drumbeat for the idea that the U.S. war effort must keep going. And again, in its news coverage, the New York Times is a bellwether for the latest media parade to the cadence of the warfare state.

During the run-up to the invasion, news stories repeatedly told about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction while the Times and other key media outlets insisted that their coverage was factually reliable. Now the same media outlets insist that their coverage is analytically reliable.

Instead of authoritative media information about aluminum tubes and mobile weapons labs, we're now getting authoritative media illumination of why a swift pullout of U.S. troops isn't realistic or desirable. The result is similar to what was happening four years ago -- a huge betrayal of journalistic responsibility.

The WMD spin was in sync with official sources and other establishment-sanctified experts, named and unnamed. The anti-pullout spin is in sync with official sources and other establishment-sanctified experts, named and unnamed.

During the weeks since the midterm election, the New York Times news coverage of Iraq policy options has often been heavy-handed, with carefully selective sourcing for prefab conclusions. Already infamous is the Nov. 15 front-page story by Michael Gordon under the headline "Get Out of Iraq Now? Not So Fast, Experts Say." A similar technique was at play Dec. 1 with yet another "News Analysis," this time by reporter David Sanger, headlined "The Only Consensus on Iraq: Nobody's Leaving Right Now."

Typically, in such reportage, the sources harmonizing with the media outlet's analysis are chosen from the cast of political characters who helped drag the United States into making war on Iraq in the first place.

What's now going on in mainline news media is some kind of repetition compulsion. And, while media professionals engage in yet another round of conformist opportunism, many people will pay with their lives.

With so many prominent American journalists navigating their stories by the lights of big Washington stars, it's not surprising that so much of the news coverage looks at what happens in Iraq through the lens of the significance for American power.

Viewing the horrors of present-day Iraq with star-spangled eyes, New York Times reporters John Burns and Kirk Semple wrote -- in the lead sentence of a front-page "News Analysis" on Nov. 29 -- that "American military and political leverage in Iraq has fallen sharply."

The second paragraph of the Baghdad-datelined article reported: "American fortunes here are ever more dependent on feuding Iraqis who seem, at times, almost heedless to American appeals."

The third paragraph reported: "It is not clear that the United States can gain new traction in Iraq..."

And so it goes -- with U.S. media obsessively focused on such concerns as "American military and political leverage," "American fortunes" and whether "the United States can gain new traction in Iraq."

With that kind of worldview, no wonder so much news coverage is serving nationalism instead of journalism.

Norman Solomon's book "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death" is out in paperback. For information, go to www.WarMadeEasy.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (83737)12/6/2006 3:45:58 AM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Bushies are not the only liars. Having won the election top Democrats now pushing for MORE US troops in Iraq. They are abandoning their promises and their base even faster than I expected.

msnbc.msn.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (83737)12/6/2006 10:29:49 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
warwoundfaker and male demoRATS are castrated by hilarylesbian:Hillary Clinton's Early Moves
No Decision on '08 Bid, But Campaign Machine Is Already Humming

By Dan Balz and Chris Cillizza
Washington Post Staff Writer and washingtonpost.com Staff Writer
Wednesday, December 6, 2006; Page A01

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) is taking a series of concrete steps toward a likely campaign for president in 2008, settling on key members of her campaign team, recruiting potential new additions to her staff, and calling Democratic activists in states with early primaries and caucuses.

No final decision on running is expected before the end of the year, according to sources knowledgeable about her thinking, as Clinton works methodically through a checklist of preparatory steps. But she and her inner circle are already ramping up for what could be a history-making bid for the White House.

Buy This Photo

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is weighing matters the way she did before her Senate bid. (By Michel Du Cille -- The Washington Post)


Security Cleared?
Government gurus and IT experts needed to fill positions in the D.C. area.

Great Jobs & Benefits: Find Yours

Save & Share Article What's This?

DiggGoogle
del.icio.usYahoo!
RedditFacebook


The latest move is the choice of longtime adviser Patti Solis Doyle as campaign manager. That follows the recent recruitment of three seasoned political operatives who, if she runs, would play key roles on what is now a rapidly expanding Clinton campaign organization.

The three are Jonathan Mantz, who has been working for New Jersey Gov. Jon S. Corzine (D), as finance director; Phil Singer, who was communications director for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, as a communications strategist; and Karen Hicks, who ran former Vermont governor Howard Dean's New Hampshire operation in 2004, to oversee organizing, particularly in the early states.

Clinton is operating on a model she used before she decided to run for the Senate in 2000. "If you want to understand the process she is going through now, you need only look at the process she went through in 1999," said Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson. "In that race, she reached out to elected officials, to potential donors [and] to policy experts and had lengthy serious meetings about whether she should run, the issues before the country, [and] what a campaign would look like."

In this case, her first step was to secure her New York political base, reaching out to the state's elected officials, including Gov.-elect Eliot L. Spitzer, labor leaders and prominent African Americans and Hispanics. Most of that activity took place last week.

This week's schedule includes phone calls to Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina, the four states with the earliest contests in 2008. Other prospective candidates have made numerous trips to the early states, but Clinton avoided such travel during her reelection campaign this year -- even forbidding her advisers to begin discussions around the country on a possible campaign.

"She's obviously very knowledgeable already," said JoDee Winterhof, a former chief of staff of Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin (D), who spoke with Clinton yesterday. "We had a good talk about how to run a campaign there. . . . She understands that this will take a significant amount of hard work and campaigning and getting to know Iowans more up close and personal."

Aides expect that, in addition to the phone calls, Clinton will hold a series of meetings in Washington with state activists and others as she nears a final decision. This morning she is scheduled to have breakfast with Harkin in Washington. Harkin is publicly committed to supporting the candidacy of Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack (D), but he said he and other Democrats in the state want the process there to be "fair and open."

Clinton has also spoken with former senator Bob Kerrey (D-Neb.), who ran against her husband, Bill Clinton, for the Democratic nomination in 1992. Kerrey is now president of the New School, a university in New York. He would not discuss the nature of that conversation.

Some Clinton advisers view the activities of other prospective Democratic candidates, particularly the mushrooming interest around Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, as a spur to the New York senator to accelerate her timetable. Others say she will not be hurried into a decision until she has completed her soundings and preparations. "She's going to do this at her own pace, and what anyone else does is not going to affect her decision-making," said Lorraine Voles, her Senate communications director.

But her presidential campaign preparations will be done on a far more compressed timetable than her decision to run for the Senate, made when she was first lady and living in the White House.

"It was a much longer process in 1999," said one Democratic strategist. "There she was not at all sure-of-foot politically. She had the carpetbagger aspect to deal with. She had no understanding of the intricacies of New York politics. So it took her a much longer time. Here there's not the luxury of a lot of time. This is a very fast-moving situation."

Clinton advisers also recognize that they must move swiftly to recruit new staff members, in part because of competition from other candidates for operatives to manage key states, to fill communications assignments and to provide the support and assistance necessary to manage an enterprise the size of a presidential campaign. This "talent primary" is seen by her advisers as critically important to her success.

The second early challenge is fundraising. Clinton spent much of the past two years using her Senate reelection campaign to build a national fundraising infrastructure to support such a candidacy. Through mid-October, Clinton had spent $36 million on her reelection race, which she went on to win with 67 percent of the vote. A large portion of those expenditures went into an extensive direct-mail program aimed at beefing up Clinton's small-dollar donor lists.

Clinton advisers are also beginning to prepare for her first travels to states such as Iowa and New Hampshire as a prospective candidate, although there is no timetable for such appearances.

Jerry Crawford, a prominent Iowa Democrat and Vilsack supporter, said yesterday that he and Clinton traded voice-mail messages during the past two days. He said that she and her staff have been "very respectful" toward Vilsack and his candidacy. But he added: "It's clear she's looking to come to Iowa, and it seems clear she's giving serious consideration competing in Iowa."