Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : 10-Bagger MINIMUM Rise from July 1, 2005 until December 31, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: creede who wrote (1606)	12/6/2006 11:56:17 PM
From: rrufff	Respond to of 1694

Creede - look at this. TVOC is one of his "SURE WINNERS". Compare this to LBWR. Huge Losses and you can't even blame that on R&D. It's just about all consultants and management. c) Company Expenses The net loss for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 was $2,291,000 and $4,875,000 as compared to the net loss of $958,000 and $4,279,000 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005. The increase in the net loss of $1,333,000 and $596,000 is principally related to increases in general and administrative expenses, which resulted from certain stock based compensation plans. Research and development expenses for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 were $334,000 and $1,252,000 as compared to $782,000 and $2,266,000 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005. This decrease amounted to $448,000 and $1,014,000. This decrease is attributable to decreased costs associated with commercializing our technologies. General and administrative expenses for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 amounted to $1,957,000 and $3,631,000 as compared to $244,000 and $2,218,000 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005. This increase amounted to $1,713,000 and $1,413,000 and is principally due to charges for consulting expenses, which resulted from certain stock based compensation plans.

To: creede who wrote (1606)	12/7/2006 12:12:01 AM
From: inchingup	Respond to of 1694

Please tell me the difference between what I said and you said: "That means it has to do in the 12 months is go 10 bags FROM THE LOW during that time. I don't know what it is, but .09 sounds about right. That would mean .90 would do it." Hence, in your scenario the purchase price of the stock is totally meaningless. Based on the above analysis of yours if I bought 100K shares tomorrow for $9,000...and at some point between now and 12/5/2007 the stock dropped to $.001 before closing at $.01 on 12/5/2007 that I had a "ten-bagger", even though it cost me $8100 in losses. That is exactly what you are promoting. If I bought 100,000 shares of stock for $1 per share and it dropped to $.001 before returning to $.01 a year later I would have a 10-bagger, despite my losses of $99,000. Talk about stupidity, you just walked off with first prize.