Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : 10-Bagger MINIMUM Rise from July 1, 2005 until December 31, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: inchingup who wrote (1649)	12/7/2006 12:53:12 PM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1694

Look I have no desire to relive the wastage of time from yesterday. You are entitled to your opinion. I've got no problem with negatives. As I have posted, LBWR has huge risks and yet those who are long here feel that it has a great opportunity. The pros and cons have been discussed ad nauseum. We really don't have new information other than a new client PR today. Optimism admittedly may just be "investor psyche" a term you use to justify,I believe, your investment in TOVC, which IMO, does not look as good as LBWR at this point. Again, why don't we all agree to disagree and cut the rest of it. I probably shouldn't have gone after you, but I am tired of people who bash a speculative stock with a very surface approach (e.g. high PE), while they feel strongly enough about other speculative stocks that may be as risky or more. Just as you feel a more complicated reading of TOVC should be made, other than how bad it looks on paper (filings), those long AURC feel that just looking at the high PE does not incorporate the company's claims to much higher numbers going forward. That's what makes markets. You like something I don't, and vice versa.

To: inchingup who wrote (1649)	12/7/2006 1:28:27 PM
From: im a survivor	Respond to of 1694

Whatever........ I saw nothing wrong with your first posts, but after reading the last 100<g> since you started posting, it is fairly obvious you are simply bashing, not 'discussing' as you claim...and no offense ( hey do I have permission from CREEDE to KISS UP TO RRUFFF again?????).....but RRufff has 100 times more credibilty then you and frankly imo, he embarassed you in your discussions. Next time try picking a fight with somebody in which you are at least able to carry their jock strap...otherwise you can continue to let him make you look like a fool in public.....I could care less.....