SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dougSF30 who wrote (219493)12/7/2006 5:44:01 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTHRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
TWY, you already said you had no evidence that Intel's yields were anything but outstanding, however you choose to define that term. And in fact, others on this thread and iHub, who would know, laughed at your yield estimates as being too low.

This is nonsense. I specified what I would call outstanding yields for a 143mm^2 die. I then estimated that Intel's yields for 143mm^2 CWM based on simple die size/yield /capacity/time/market issues are much below that and thus NOT outstanding. You CONTINUALLY refuse to put a number on your claim. Why? What is your problem? I ask again for a % yield to attach to your outstanding yields claim.

THE WATSONYOUTH



To: dougSF30 who wrote (219493)12/7/2006 7:50:23 PM
From: TGPTNDRRespond to of 275872
 
Doug, Re: TWY, you already said you had no evidence that Intel's yields were anything but outstanding...>

Would you care to post a link to that TWY assertion?

-tgp