SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (219524)12/7/2006 8:38:28 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTHRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
9Is that your entire case?

That is not the case at all. Very simply, the case is if Intel's yields were outstanding at the 75% level for CWM, the product mix out of as little as 2.5 fabs in Q4 for sale in Q1 07 would be 100% dual core and at least 80% CWM. Now, one reason the product mix will be far less aggressive than that is that CWM yields are far below 75%. Another is that Intel prefers the projected product mix in Q1 07 of maybe 50% CWM and millions of 65nm and 90 nm Celeron Ds. As a consequence, a good deal of capacity sits unused. So, explain to me why it is better for Intel to withhold capacity and have a less desirable product line. I'm sure some marketing types can come up with a reason.

THE WATSONYOUTH



To: Elmer Phud who wrote (219524)12/7/2006 8:54:24 PM
From: justaviewRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
NSM just reported FAB utilization rate of 58%.

Intel is sitting on some $4B in P4 inventory that nobody wants. It wouldn't be prudent for them to build CMW at 100% utilization rate if the market can only take say 65%. This is not a good situation for Intel or AMD. Intel is putting AMD's margins in a vise and squeezing them with the P4 from the low end and with the CMW from the high end.