SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WAR on Terror. Will it engulf the Entire Middle East? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chas. who wrote (18356)12/9/2006 9:38:54 AM
From: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck  Respond to of 32591
 
Blair says immigrants have a ‘duty' to integrate
DAVID STRINGER

Associated Press

theglobeandmail.com

LONDON — British Prime Minister Tony Blair said Friday it was the duty of all immigrants to integrate into British society, stoking a simmering debate over religious tolerance and cultural assimilation in the country.

Mr. Blair also announced plans to more carefully allocate funding to faith groups, saying grants would no longer be awarded to organizations that do not promote understanding.

“When it comes to our essential values — belief in democracy, the rule of law, tolerance, equal treatment for all, respect for this country and its shared heritage — then that is where we come together, it is what we hold in common,” Mr. Blair told invited guests at his Downing Street office.

He said he believed it was the duty of all immigrants to embrace those values.

“Our tolerance is part of what makes Britain, Britain. So conform to it — or don't come here,” Blair said. “We don't want the hatemongers, whatever their race, religion or creed.”

Mr. Blair said the recent debate in Britain over Muslim head scarves is part of a larger concern over the integration of the country's 1.6 million Muslims into society.

Former Foreign Secretary Jack Straw set off the dispute in October by saying that he requested — but did not insist — that Muslim women remove face-covering veils during one-on-one meetings in his office. Mr. Blair said at the time that veils were seen as a “mark of separation.”

The suspension earlier this year of a Muslim teaching assistant who insisted on wearing the veil at school also fuelled the debate.

Mr. Blair said Friday it was “plain common sense that when it is an essential part of someone's work to communicate directly with people, being able to see their face is important.”

He also said the four suicide bombers who killed 52 commuters in attacks on the London transport network in July 2005 had exposed problems in the relationships among Britain's religious communities. Three of the bombers were British-born children of Pakistani immigrants, and the fourth was a naturalized Briton born in Jamaica.

“Their emphasis was not on shared values but separate ones, values based on a warped distortion of the faith of Islam,” Blair said. “It has thrown into sharp relief the nature of what we have called, with approval, 'multicultural Britain.”'

He said the London attacks had caused, for the first time in a generation, “an unease, an anxiety, even at points a resentment” about Britain's tradition of offering refuge to people from across the globe and allowing people of all religions to practice their faith.

Mr. Blair said he had expected the initial reaction following the London bombings to be one of people sticking together. “Our second reaction, in time, would also be very British: We're not going to be taken for a ride,” he said.

He said money allocated to faith groups would now be tightly controlled. He also called on all faith schools to partner with institutions teaching a different religion and hailed laws requiring preachers arriving in Britain from overseas to be able to speak English.

Mr. Blair in the past has acknowledged a wider problem in Britain with radical religious clerics, and has banned two organizations with links to extremist preachers.

Police said the London bombers had attended sermons by radical cleric Abu Hamza al-Masri, who in February was sentenced to seven years in prison for inciting followers to kill non-Muslims.

Omar Bakri Mohammed, 46, who lived in Britain for 20 years and ran the now-disbanded radical Islamist group al-Muhajiroun, was deported in 2005. His organization gained notoriety for praising the hijackers in the Sept. 11 terror attacks.



To: Chas. who wrote (18356)12/12/2006 5:42:06 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32591
 
Re: Gus longs for the days of Hitler, dreams of Aryan control...

So what?! "Aryan control" is a joke when compared to "Judeofascist control" --clue:

Routine and systematic torture is at the heart of America's war on terror

In the fight against cruelty, barbarism and extremism, America has embraced the very evils it claims to confront

George Monbiot

Tuesday December 12, 2006
The Guardian


After thousands of years of practice, you might have imagined that every possible means of inflicting pain had already been devised. But you should never underestimate the human capacity for invention. United States interrogators, we now discover, have found a new way of destroying a human being.

Last week, defence lawyers acting for José Padilla, a US citizen detained as an "enemy combatant", released a video showing a mission fraught with deadly risk - taking him to the prison dentist. A group of masked guards in riot gear shackled his legs and hands, blindfolded him with black-out goggles and shut off his hearing with headphones, then marched him down the prison corridor.

Is Padilla really that dangerous? Far from it: his warders describe him as so docile and inactive that he could be mistaken for "a piece of furniture". The purpose of these measures appeared to be to sustain the regime under which he had lived for more than three years: total sensory deprivation. He had been kept in a blacked-out cell, unable to see or hear anything beyond it. Most importantly, he had had no human contact, except for being bounced off the walls from time to time by his interrogators. As a result, he appears to have lost his mind. I don't mean this metaphorically. I mean that his mind is no longer there.

The forensic psychiatrist who examined him says that he "does not appreciate the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him, is unable to render assistance to counsel, and has impairments in reasoning as the result of a mental illness, ie, post-traumatic stress disorder, complicated by the neuropsychiatric effects of prolonged isolation". José Padilla appears to have been lobotomised: not medically, but socially.

If this was an attempt to extract information, it was ineffective: the authorities held him without charge for three and half years. Then, threatened by a supreme court ruling, they suddenly dropped their claims that he was trying to detonate a dirty bomb. They have now charged him with some vague and lesser offences to do with support for terrorism. He is unlikely to be the only person subjected to this regime. Another "enemy combatant", Ali al-Marri, claims to have been subject to the same total isolation and sensory deprivation, in the same naval prison in South Carolina. God knows what is being done to people who have disappeared into the CIA's foreign oubliettes.

That the US tortures, routinely and systematically, while prosecuting its "war on terror" can no longer be seriously disputed. The Detainee Abuse and Accountability Project (DAA), a coalition of academics and human-rights groups, has documented the abuse or killing of 460 inmates of US military prisons in Afghanistan, Iraq and at Guantánamo Bay. This, it says, is necessarily a conservative figure: many cases will remain unrecorded. The prisoners were beaten, raped, forced to abuse themselves, forced to maintain "stress positions", and subjected to prolonged sleep deprivation and mock executions.

The New York Times reports that prisoners held by the US military at Bagram airbase in Afghanistan were made to stand for up to 13 days with their hands chained to the ceiling, naked, hooded and unable to sleep. The Washington Post alleges that prisoners at the same airbase were "commonly blindfolded and thrown into walls, bound in painful positions, subjected to loud noises and deprived of sleep" while kept, like Padilla and the arrivals at Guantánamo, "in black hoods or spray-painted goggles".

Alfred McCoy, professor of history at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, argues that the photographs released from the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq reflect standard CIA torture techniques: "stress positions, sensory deprivation, and sexual humiliation". The famous picture of the hooded man standing on a box, with wires attached to his fingers, shows two of these techniques being used at once. Unable to see, he has no idea how much time has passed or what might be coming next. He stands in a classic stress position - maintained for several hours, it causes excruciating pain. He appears to have been told that if he drops his arms he will be electrocuted. What went wrong at Abu Ghraib is that someone took photos. Everything else was done by the book.

Neither the military nor the civilian authorities have broken much sweat in investigating these crimes. A few very small fish have been imprisoned; a few others have been fined or reduced in rank; in most cases the authorities have either failed to investigate or failed to prosecute. The DAA points out that no officer has yet been held to account for torture practised by his subordinates. US torturers appear to enjoy impunity, until they are stupid enough to take pictures of each other.

But Padilla's treatment also reflects another glorious American tradition: solitary confinement. Some 25,000 US prisoners are currently held in isolation - a punishment only rarely used in other democracies. In some places, like the federal prison in Florence, Colorado, they are kept in sound-proofed cells and might scarcely see another human being for years on end. They may touch or be touched by no one. Some people have been kept in solitary confinement in the US for more than 20 years.

At Pelican Bay in California, where 1,200 people are held in the isolation wing, inmates are confined to tiny cells for 22 and a half hours a day, then released into an "exercise yard" for "recreation". The yard consists of a concrete well about 3.5 metres in length with walls 6 metres high and a metal grille across the sky. The recreation consists of pacing back and forth, alone.

The results are much as you would expect. As National Public Radio reveals, more than 10% of the isolation prisoners at Pelican Bay are now in the psychiatric ward, and there's a waiting list. Prisoners in solitary confinement, according to Dr Henry Weinstein, a psychiatrist who studies them, suffer from "memory loss to severe anxiety to hallucinations to delusions ... under the severest cases of sensory deprivation, people go crazy." People who went in bad and dangerous come out mad as well. The only two studies conducted so far - in Texas and Washington state - both show that the recidivism rates for prisoners held in solitary confinement are worse than for those who were allowed to mix with other prisoners. If we were to judge the US by its penal policies, we would perceive a strange beast: a Christian society that believes in neither forgiveness nor redemption.

From this delightful experiment, US interrogators appear to have extracted a useful lesson: if you want to erase a man's mind, deprive him of contact with the rest of the world. This has nothing to do with obtaining information: torture of all kinds - physical or mental - produces the result that people will say anything to make it end. It is about power, and the thrilling discovery that in the right conditions one man's power over another is unlimited. It is an indulgence which turns its perpetrators into everything they claim to be confronting.

President Bush maintains that he is fighting a war against threats to the "values of civilised nations": terror, cruelty, barbarism and extremism. He asked his nation's interrogators to discover where these evils are hidden. They should congratulate themselves. They appear to have succeeded.

monbiot.com

guardian.co.uk