Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (314767)	12/9/2006 6:54:41 PM
From: Taro	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572298

But then you got that the warming then lags the rise in CO2 by 800 years. I don't see where you get that. Combelly, man you cannot read. Here is how I got to that based on the article by your expert GW friend and his strange deudctions of the facts from the ice cores: Combine this At least three careful ice core studies have shown that CO2 starts to rise about 800 years (600-1000 years) after Antarctic temperature during glacial terminations. with this Some (currently unknown) process causes Antarctica and the surrounding ocean to warm. This process also causes CO2 to start rising, about 800 years later. and the point is made (albeit not by me) that elevated temperatures cause a rise in CO2 levels starting 800 years later. That was the only way he could "explain" how elevated temperatures coming up ahead of the elevated CO2 levels in those ice cores while still fitting into his "scientific" explanation about how CO2 levels trailing the temperatures could be the cause of the elevated temperatures predating those elevated CO2 levels. Weird? Yes indeed. Unless liberal logic is applied that is. But don't shoot me, I am just the messenger here. Taro