SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: economaniack who wrote (219872)12/10/2006 12:33:31 AM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
I am fairly sure that I have read a fair number of recent comments that CMW yields must be poor to justify the slow ramp

1. An AMD fan posting wishful comments doesn't make it so.
2. The ramp is anything but slow.

and low power performance that somewhat offset CMW's performance edge

Not really. CMW also drastically improved Intel's power requirements.

so I don't know what the scale factor was,

I do, and I just told you what it was.

nor what changes have been made to the core.

Nothing other than a bugfix or two.



To: economaniack who wrote (219872)12/10/2006 12:35:35 AM
From: FJBRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
not too long ago Otellini himself lamented that Intel wasn't matching AMD throughput

What are you referring to? I don't recall anything along those lines.



To: economaniack who wrote (219872)12/10/2006 7:12:44 AM
From: aleph0Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
economaniack, first a big thanks for making this board interesting again.

I agree with your statement on being more worried about ATI than CPU revenues/ASPs etc.

My question :
Is there a distinct disadvantage in having ATI/AMD as a merger rather than an aquisition ?

A merger wouldn't have cost AMD a penny IMO.
Is this just a question of "ego" in terms of "who" runs the company from then on ? .. or are there more serious factors involved ?

TIA