SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (314879)12/10/2006 9:31:36 AM
From: Taro  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572616
 
You are a case, CJ: I personally never believed any of that BS and also clearly stated that. A guy from your camp came up with same weird construction, a true believer in CO2 caused Global Warming.

But it seems that so far that is the sole effort to come up with some kind of explanation of how increased CO2 levels cause the warming expected to follow, when indeed the warming data well correlated with CO2 data unfortunately happens to ramp ahead of the trailing CO2 data.

I know it shouldn't be like that, but the ice cores don't lie.

They don't go away either - unless some confused guy uses wrong kind of transportation thus turning them into water while on the way from the polar regions ;)

Could have been sabotage, you know.

Taro



To: combjelly who wrote (314879)12/15/2006 1:23:18 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1572616
 
"I posted the explicit language stating exactly that several times already "

I know you have explicitly stated that temperature rises 800 years after the CO2 concentrations go up. What you haven't provided is a basis for believing that is true. Neither through an observation nor a mechanism.


Its about this stage of your interactions with Taro when he will start calling you liar.