Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (18310)	12/12/2006 12:10:27 AM
From: Peter Ecclesine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46821

Hi Frank, ntia.doc.gov < US chart in pdf IEEE 802.11p is just the radio part, and IEEE 1609 is above the radio standards.its.dot.gov google IEEE 1609 for a lot more. It is in a race with a Japanese standard's effort and a European effort. Right now it is not in first place, and Japan will have a strong showing next month at CEA in Las Vegas. Think Nippon Denso. Lots of politics. There are no IEEE 802 band allocations, nor are there exclusively unlicensed bands ;-) All license-exempt bands are shared. Conversely, we make standards to match allocations, like 802.11j for Japan's 4.9 GHz and 5 GHz operation ;-) and 3650-3700 MHz Operation in USA ;-0 Sometimes, we try to become the rules - TV band whitespace and IEEE 802.22, sometimes we fail - 802.15.3 Ultra WideBand. petere