SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: neolib who wrote (210510)12/13/2006 11:22:51 AM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 281500
 
Ah, so I could have deducted mileage driving to some of the places I've donated a days worth of work. I haven't though. Though if I or someone else had, its hard to think of this as some sort of "abuse" that we need to worry about.

I think fretting about the efficiency and what people may or may not be deducting on their tax returns is futile and of little use.

------------------------------

Those critical of charitable giving tend to think the government should do everything. Of course, everyone who works for the government is paid a salary, has an expense account and uses it, etc. and efficiency is not something government is known for. So critiquing charitable givers on the grounds of inefficiency - private givers are likely to be at least as efficient as government services.



To: neolib who wrote (210510)12/13/2006 12:13:18 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I've come up with one example of charitable giving I definitely don't approve of. That is Ted Turner's gift of $1 billion to the UN, a dispacably evil organization which mainly seems to exist to protect perpetrators of genocide (Darfur, Rwanda, Srbenica), murderous dictators, and other human rights violators. Not to mention trying to suppress world economic development via IPCC.