Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rink who wrote (220296)	12/13/2006 1:16:11 PM
From: dougSF30	Respond to of 275872

Rink, of course it is all speculative at this point. I'm merely saying that the best fit of all the data, IMO, would be QC parts @ 120W @ 2.4-2.5GHz, and DC parts @ 2.7-2.9GHz. I don't believe there will be desktop/FX parts clocked significantly faster than server parts of the same core multiplicity, and I don't believe there will be huge progress made in between server and desktop launch. Finally, I feel that the 2.5GHz QC top bin @ 120W fits better with what we know about current 65nm K8 parts. Perhaps we will learn some more tomorrow?