SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (210728)12/17/2006 3:53:19 PM
From: Noel de Leon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Take 10% of the world's 5 largest military budgets and put it into agricultural development and the hunger problems go away. Cut agricultural subsidies so that developing countries can compete in western markets and the poverty problems start to go away. Yes, it is our fault(western world).



To: steve harris who wrote (210728)12/17/2006 3:59:55 PM
From: Noel de Leon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
As an example: Afghanistan's opium. If the west bought it legally(there is a shortage for medicinal purposes)we would create a viable agricultural base. Then the Taleban could be short circuited, the mob could be short circuited, and the war lords could be short circuited. We could supply addicts with a controlled product and reduce crime in western countries. We win, the Afghanis win, Osama looses, Taleban looses, the mob looses, the war lords loose.



To: steve harris who wrote (210728)12/17/2006 11:14:59 PM
From: jttmab  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
another elitist viewpoint: "it's all our fault"

I hope that someday you'll be brighter than a stump. But I won't hold my breadth.

jttmab



To: steve harris who wrote (210728)12/18/2006 3:01:13 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Today, more than 1 billion people in the world are chronically starving and malnurished. By contrast, the United States throws away 100 billion tons of food a year.

another elitist viewpoint: "it's all our fault"


It doesn't say its our fault. Correlation does not equal causation.

I would interpret the above as saying that freedom loving, capitalistic, human rights following, rule of law abiding democratic countries get lots of food. Countries which don't follow those ideals may not. :-)