Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (406)	12/17/2006 6:30:33 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 149317

Agreed, McCain is wrong, but he's still a formidable candidate amongst the moderate swing-voters, the type who voted for Perot and decide close elections. So beware about sending a black, woman or obvious liberal against McCain in the heartland, no matter how charismatic they may be. Remember we didn't take back the Senate by running liberals. And I still say it is extremely likely that our next president will end up being a white male.

To: stockman_scott who wrote (406)	12/17/2006 7:21:25 PM
From: MJ	Respond to of 149317

"Powell also agreed with the study group's recommendation that the administration open talks with Syria and Iran as it gropes for a solution to the Iraq problem. Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice have explicitly rejected talks until Syria ends its destabilizing influence in Lebanon and support for anti-Israel militants, and until Iran suspends its nuclear enrichment program. The administration has charged both countries with aiding the Iraqi insurgency." Agree with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's position that Syria end its destabilizing in Lebanon and stop suporting ani-Israel militants plus Iran suspending its nuclear enrichment program----- once those conditions are being met then we talk. If these conditions are not met, Iran will come to the table and says we want the nuclear capability as a condition for using our influence in Iraq ------for withdrawing Iran's monetary and military support of the insurgency in Iraq--- while simultaneously not doing so. With Iran wanting an enrichment program we are back to the cold war days of Mutually Assured Destruction---------is that what we want? I think not.