Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (16918)	12/18/2006 4:03:27 AM
From: Don Earl	Respond to of 20039

Rense is kind of strange. I've seen excellent articles on the site as well as stuff not credible enough to dignify as rumor. As an aside, one trick that works well for long lines is to cut and past it to Word, or whatever you use for a word processor program. It's also a good trick for friends who get their email settings off and send you those three line emails twenty screens wide. I think one of the worst parts of the so called 9/11 Truth Movement is its state of pure anarchy. Where you'd kind of think there'd be a certain amount of consolidation by now, it gets more fragmented by the day. That was my impression back when a web search for "9/11 conspiracy" would turn up 30,000 hits, where now it'll produce over 20 million. And, for some reason, the bad information almost seems to spread faster than the good. I don't know who is backing Jones, but he popped up out of no where about a year ago, with press coverage the serious researchers can only dream about, and he quit his day job to devote all his time to spreading misinformation. In the mean time, his ex sidekick Fetzer is happily promoting ray gun theories on their so called "scholar" site, which is linked to by half the sites out there. The CoIntelPro folks must be laughing their tails off at the success they've had in fracturing an effort that should have been turning in indictments several years.

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (16918)	12/18/2006 5:57:30 PM
From: Don Earl	Respond to of 20039

Speaking of NIST, I was skimming through my bookmarks and ran across this item from 4 years ago: construction.com It makes for a rather interesting contrast between the report they said they were going to do and the report they did. According to the article, they were not going to rule out any possibilities, and they were going to interview over 600 witnesses. A year or so ago I ran a search for 9/11 blogs. Not conspiracy theory stuff, just people who were there and wrote up accounts of what they saw. Without exception, anyone who was close enough to see, hear or feel explosions; saw heard or felt explosions. I'd be kind of interested in seeing the transcripts of those 600 interviews NIST supposedly conducted.