SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (316301)12/18/2006 6:01:32 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574483
 
"I don't understand why globalization is not effecting their salaries."

Because globalization hasn't hit the ranks of management yet. Management improves the bottom line by replacing American workers with foreign workers and the stock price goes UP. At first, it was only factory workers, now it's engineers and information workers - really, ANYTHING that can be done remotely.

Eventually, the darwinian competition for the absolute lowest labor cost will get the management too. Who'll be the first board of directors to realize the tremendous cost savings to be had by offshoring management?



To: tejek who wrote (316301)12/19/2006 2:44:56 AM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574483
 
In fact, upper mgmt. salaries have been growing by leaps and bounds. I don't understand why globalization is not effecting their salaries.

The new entrants in the global economy are primarily low end laborers, not upper management types. But who knows, maybe in 30-60 years there will be pressure on upper management salaries as China and India are able to provide loads of experienced Executive VP level employees for $60k per year? It doesn't seem that unlikely. Somebody in India is managing people now, 50 years from now there will be hundreds of thousands of experienced senior management staff, so IBM will employ them for $60k rather than some guy in Armonk, New York for $260k?