Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (316627)	12/20/2006 10:36:46 AM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574637

"the middle class is not the source of strength in the US economy!" This isn't really arguable. Message 23117123 If our middle class stopped consuming, economies across the globe would die, not just ours. Your contention is ridiculous on it's face. I'm listening to president chimp Nero right now, who just urged me to "go shopping!", just like he did after 9/11.

To: Elroy who wrote (316627)	12/20/2006 3:55:23 PM
From: Road Walker	Respond to of 1574637

Just print it... AP: Pentagon wants $99.7B more for wars By ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press Writer 20 minutes ago The Pentagon wants the White House to seek an additional $99.7 billion to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to information provided to The Associated Press. The military's request, if embraced by President Bush and approved by Congress, would boost this year's budget for those wars to about $170 billion. Military planners assembled the proposal at a time when Bush is developing new strategies for Iraq, such as sending thousands of more U.S. troops there, although it was put together before the president said the troop surge was under consideration. Overall, the war in Iraq has cost about $350 billion. Combined with the conflict in Afghanistan and operations against terrorism elsewhere, the cost has topped $500 billion, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service. The additional funds, if approved, would push this year's cost of the war in Iraq to about $50 billion over last year's record. In September, Congress approved an initial $70 billion for the current budget year, which began Oct. 1. A description of the Pentagon request was provided by a person familiar with the proposal who asked for anonymity because the person was not authorized to release the information. The cost of the war has risen dramatically as the security situation has deteriorated and more equipment is destroyed or worn out in harsh conditions. The Army, which has borne the brunt of the fighting, would receive about half of the request, a reflection of the wear and tear that the war has had on soldiers and their equipment. An additional $9.8 billion is being sought for training and equipping Iraq's and Afghanistan's security forces. The administration's request for more Iraq money will be submitted along with Bush's budget in February for the 2008 budget year, which starts next Oct. 1. The White House can add or subtract from the Pentagon request as it sees fit, and the total could grow if money is added for reconstruction costs. In a memo several weeks ago, Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England encouraged the services to include in their budget requests projects connected to the broader fight against terrorism, as opposed to costs strictly limited to Iraq and Afghanistan. Critics have said that could be interpreted to cover almost anything. The budget request includes: _$41.5 billion to cover the costs of ongoing military operations. _$26.7 billion for replacing and repairing equipment damaged or destroyed in Iraq and Afghanistan. _$10 billion for body armor and other equipment to protect U.S. troops from attack. _$2.5 billion to combat roadside bombs and other improvised explosive devices. _$2.7 billion for intelligence activities. Whatever request emerges from the Bush administration will go to a new Congress controlled by Democrats highly critical of the Iraq war and Bush's handling of it. Even so, there is much sentiment among Democrats to protect troops and much fear about being portrayed as unsympathetic to men and women in uniform. These factors probably would overwhelm any efforts by anti-war Democrats to use the debate over the Iraq money to take on Bush's conduct of the war. Democrats have promised, however, to give the upcoming request greater scrutiny than Republicans did when considering Bush's previous requests.