Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (316784)	12/21/2006 8:14:21 AM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1571808

"Don't need any help. CO2 is CO2." Yes. "It seems to me that you are trying to sell the idea that they are different based upon the source." No. "Trying to sell the idea that natural sources of CO2 do not contribute to global warming will work either. " It is all about adding more carbon to the system. It is a complicated idea that apparently you can't grasp. "Coal produced CO2 levels are insignificant." 10^13 tons of CO2. A big, you have to admit.

To: steve harris who wrote (316784)	12/21/2006 8:14:38 AM
From: Alighieri	Respond to of 1571808

If mother earth was just fine with her own sources of CO2, then it all went to hell when humans showed up and started breathing. Stop breathing then and finally make a contribution to this thread. Al