Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (316873)	12/22/2006 7:48:18 AM
From: Taro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578560

OK, so far I am on your side. Also I believe we can agree that new fossil energy storage like coal or oil don't form and thus recreate within say 800,000 years right? So here my question: What made the high levels of CO2 during the several peaks within the last 800,000 years go away? Those peaks were high and as opposed to what our doomsday man made GW believers preach, the Earth ecosystem repeatedly proved it is self healing and certainly not running away from the peaks like they claim. Wouldn't it make equally much sense to spend at least half of the resources now invested in creating theories for the purpose of spreading a doomsday gospel on research into the other side of the cycles? I mean, how much do we understand about what mechanisms reduced those CO2 peaks and pulled them back to normal in the past? Man made or - most likely - not... Your understanding at a pico climate level how CO2 infrared absorption and re radiation is great but nobody knows how that interacts with H2O steam and other facts at macro climate global levels. Taro