SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: StockDung who wrote (18643)12/22/2006 4:55:18 PM
From: RockyBalboa  Respond to of 19428
 
Not a bad article by the Fools regarding Escala, the coin and stamp trading house befallen by the spanish fraud...still means like, short with impunity

Escala's Rally Before the Fall
By Rich Duprey
December 21, 2006
When your company has been living under the shadow of fraud for nearly a year, any bit of good news can serve to create a bit of enthusiasm. Such is the case with stamp and coin trading house Escala (Nasdaq: ESCL) which saw its stock tumble more than 80% when its parent company, AfinsaBienes Tangibles, was raided by Spanish authorities and accused of running a con game.

Tuesday, Escala reported it had completed its own internal investigation and found that -- surprise! -- no one had done anything wrong. That apparently cheered investors so much that the stock nearly doubled in price on the day, rising to over $8 per share. It's a long way from those heady days when it traded at $35 a share, but better than when it looked like it was going to zero.

Which it still might. There are reasons beside shareholder enthusiasm that could have played into yesterday's run up.

Nearly 20% of Escala's shares are sold short, meaning that people have borrowed the shares in the belief that the stock price will go down. When there is a sharp rise in the price of the stock, short sellers buy back their shares at the higher price to limit their losses, which fuels further share price increases and more shorts buy back their shares. And so on. It's called a short squeeze, and it can really run up a stock's price.

When sales are not sales
Escala said it was going to restate its financial results from 2003 to 2005 as well as the first three quarters of 2006. Certain "archival sales" of stamps to Afinsa were improperly recognized as related party transactions but should have actually been divided between related party sales and additional paid-in capital, which is money a company receives from investors in addition to stock they received. Afinsa is the largest shareholder of Escala, owning nearly three-quarters of the stock, and was also the third largest auction house in the world behind Sotheby's (NYSE: BID) and Christie's before getting raided by Spanish authorities and charged with fraud.

Escala estimates the value of the restated archival sales is approximately $73 million of the total $417 million received since 2003. However, those sales comprised a much larger portion of the company's profits during that time period. While the sales represent only 17% of the revenues for the period, they accounted for 73% of the $100 million in profits Escala made.

Sales and profits from transactions with Afinsa had always amounted to the bulk of Escala's valuation. Having completely severed ties with its parent, Escala will earn only the slimmest of margins from its other arms, such as A-Mark Precious Metals that it acquired last year. Even then, however, I wonder how long that can last. The president of A-Mark is also the president of Spectrum Numismatics, another Escala affiliate that is at the center of its own fraud scandal over coin deals made with the Ohio Bureau of Worker's Compensation. The central figure in that scheme has already been jailed and the investigation continues.

Value is what I say it is
Escala's supposed independent investigation leaves a lot to be desired. In addition to the archival sales, additional sales to Afinsa were supposedly conducted at arm's length, meaning the terms agreed to were similar to those that could have been arranged with an independent third party. Yet the audit committee said that was not the case and their value was vastly overinflated as well.

The committee found that the prices negotiated for the stamps sold to Afinsa were sometimes referenced to catalogue prices, a discredited means of determining a stamp's true value, since it was Afinsa or Escala themselves who set the catalogue prices. Furthermore, for some of the transactions not set by catalogues, appraisers did not have complete information to make a valid appraisal. The committee could not say that more complete information would have changed the valuation, neither could it determine the fair market value on its own.

Moreover, while the press release issued by Escala touted the fact that everyone cooperated with the investigation, further on in the filing was the note that "certain other persons did decline to be interviewed, and the Audit Committee was unable to compel these individuals to provide information. Further, persons providing information to the Audit Committee did not do so under oath."

Based on "the available" evidence, the audit committee has come to conclusions based on incomplete evidence.

More room for doubt
Let's hope they explain some of the anomalies in their statement. If you remove the $73 million in special sales, the audit committee wants us to believe that Escala sold to $344 million worth of stamps to Afinsa over 13 quarters, or about $106 million a year. Yet that's implausible because that's roughly equal to the entire amount of all collectible stamps sold by U.S. auctions annually, according to industry publication Linn's Stamps.

Escala is delinquent in filing its financial statements with the SEC. It has not filed its annual report for the period ending June 30 or its report for the September 30 quarter. Despite having been advised by the Nasdaq exchange that it faced delisting and had a meeting with the listing committee, it is now more than 30 days past the deadline set by the exchange to have its financials in order. Considering the length of time involved in being delinquent and that they just admitted to grossly overstating revenues and profits over several years, one would expect additional extensions be in short supply.

Despite the claim of having found no fraud, there has been a wholesale departure of top executives in recent weeks. CEO Jose Miguel Herrero, former CEO and founder Greg Manning, and past CFO Larry Crawford have all resigned. Indeed, Greg Manning resigned on Friday, right after the audit committee's report was reviewed by the board of directors. It's certainly an interesting way of responding to a report that supposedly vindicates and exonerates you.

One Fool's final thoughts
Escala was once a thriving, if parochial, stamp and coin trading dealer. Swept into the maw of its parent Afinsa, it seems to have gotten caught up in the pattern of fraud and deception which has brought down the Spanish trading house. While it might not have overtly committed a crime, it certainly benefited from it.

Escala massively overstated its revenues, the recasting of which wipes out huge swaths of previously reported profits. This Fool finds it hard to believe such actions occurred unintentionally, and the mass resignations certainly suggest that others agree.

Thus far it has been kept alive by the good graces of Nasdaq's governors, who have yet to throw the company off the exchange, but should it survive that death knell, it still may have to contend with Spanish authorities who have hinted that any remaining value left in Escala may be seized to make whole the Spanish investors that have been swindled.

Look at the rally of the last two days not as a portent of things to come, but perhaps as a last gasp before the gavel falls.

Postage Due for Escala
Escala's Canceled Stamp
Foolanthropy is celebrating its 10th year! To learn more about our five Foolish charities or to make a donation, visit www.foolanthropy.com.

Fool contributor Rich Duprey is not long or short Escala and does not own any of the other stocks mentioned in this article. You can see his holdings here. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.



To: StockDung who wrote (18643)1/1/2007 7:52:20 AM
From: scion  Respond to of 19428
 
SEC CHARGES FORMER REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVE AND HEDGE FUND MANAGER JOHN MANGAN, JR. WITH UNLAWFUL INSIDER TRADING AND UNREGISTERED SALES OF SECURITIES IN CONNECTION WITH COMPUDYNE PIPE OFFERING

sec.gov

The Commission announced today that it has filed a complaint against
John F. Mangan, Jr. (Mangan) in the U.S..District Court for the
Western District of North Carolina alleging that Mangan committed
unlawful insider trading by short selling securities of CompuDyne
Corporation prior to the public announcement of a private investment
in public equity (PIPE) offering. The complaint also alleges that
Mangan engaged in unregistered sales of securities. At the time of the
relevant conduct, Mangan was a registered representative of Friedman,
Billings, Ramsey & Co., Inc. (FBR), a registered broker-dealer and the
placement agent for the PIPE offering. Mangan executed his alleged
illegal trades through the account of HLM Securities, LLC (HLM), which
was an account of his business partner, Hugh L. McColl, III (McColl
III).

The Commission's complaint alleges that in the fall of 2001, Mangan,
on the basis of material, nonpublic information concerning the PIPE
offering, and in breach of duties of trust and confidence, traded in
CompuDyne stock in advance of the public announcement of the CompuDyne
PIPE offering and its terms. As a result of his unlawful insider
trading, Mangan reaped $56,937 in ill-gotten gains.

The complaint further alleges that after the public announcement of
the PIPE offering, Mangan continued short selling CompuDyne stock.
After the resale registration statement became effective, Mangan used
the shares that HLM obtained in the PIPE offering to cover all of the
short sales. By short selling CompuDyne securities before the
effective date of the resale registration statement for the CompuDyne
PIPE shares, and covering the short sales with the shares HLM received
from the PIPE offering, Mangan effectively sold HLM's PIPE shares
prior to their registration. As a result of Mangan's unregistered
sales of CompuDyne stock, he obtained an additional $121,933 in ill-
gotten gains. Mangan split the profits he earned from his improper
trading with McColl III.

The Commission's complaint alleges that Mangan's short selling of
CompuDyne shares prior to the public announcement of the PIPE offering
violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act)
and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange
Act) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint further alleges that
Mangan violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act by short
selling CompuDyne shares prior to the effective date of the resale
registration statement for the PIPE shares and covering those short
sales with the shares HLM purchased in the PIPE offering. The
complaint also alleges that the Commission has named McColl III solely
as a relief defendant in that action, in connection with his receipt
of trading profits from Mangan.

Without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint, McColl
III has consented to the entry of a final order, subject to the
court's approval, requiring McColl III, solely as a relief defendant,
to pay a total of $115,643.

The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the NASD with respect to
this matter. [SEC v. John F. Mangan, Jr., Civil Action No. 06-CV-531,
WDNC] (LR-19955)

sec.gov