Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (12846)	12/23/2006 4:56:36 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 218134

What? Where did you get that idea? I must have dramatically changed my mind and developed amnesia too. Or, you got it wrong as usual: <.. you do remember what maurice had to say about the japanese, do you not, about how china would be in effect better off had japan had its way?> Americans whose ancestors were slaves are better off than if their ancestors had remained slaves in Africa [I dare say and I haven't heard of "right of return" demands so I suspect they prefer the USA]. So such oddities can happen. In some respects, China might have been better off if Japan had succeeded in conquest, as China might have avoided Maoistic mania and decades of poverty, with Japanese capital and technology combined with a billion upgrading Chinese. But that's so much absurd conjecture that it's pointless to ponder what might have been. I have enough to do with what is actually happening and what will happen, let alone what has happened, and what might have happened if something that has happened hadn't happened. Mqurice