Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (12869)	12/23/2006 7:12:38 AM
From: elmatador	Respond to of 218149

A Virginia congressman defends his call for an immigration crackdown to thwart Koran's use in swearing-in ceremonies. latimes.com I am amazed that no one saw it coming. Countries accepted refugees and immigrants from poorer countries because they wanted someone to do the work they didn’t want to do. People who immigrate were the most backward, uneducated and most likely to stick to the beliefs they had at home. As they piled up, first they reproduced fast. Second they brought more of them accompanying them. After a couple of decades, there you are: They are voting for their own representatives. But wait a moment, you’d be saying: Is this not Elmat the proponent of mass migration? Of course is still me. The above status quo is being solved, not by the hand of the government. It is being solved by the hordes of LATAM shirtless immigrating illegally. Those serve as countervailing power for the Moslem hordes. Left to the government regulations on immigration the place would be going to eat kebab in a matter of a couple of decades. This Moslem people, mind you, they want to go to heaven, they want they ass up partying but they love the goodies. Those western goodies? There’s no one turning their backs on mobile phones, plasma screen, holidays, DVD’s, Oshkosh clothes for the kids, Nike tennis shoes, nice houses, you name it! They may hate the great Satan but the love the hellish goodies. They are not stupid. You will never see a movement saying: We are leaving those lands of the infidels, where we have porno channels, mini-skirts, and the like... We want all to go back to the tribal life inside a tent and milk goats… No you don’t see. Why you don’t see? Because they love the hellish goodies of those westerners infidels, just like me and TJ.

To: TobagoJack who wrote (12869)	12/23/2006 7:09:08 PM
From: Slagle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218149

TJ, You and Maurice both present a view of the Nazis which I believe is historically flawed, even though it is the establishment viewpoint. There has been a great deal of new thinking and a considerable effort to come to a realistic view of the Nazi period in light of recent revelations from the Soviet archives and elsewhere and to try to come to a realistic understanding of the Nazis untainted by war era propaganda or any other distortions. Earlier this week, the primary scholar and writer on the Nazi period, David Irving, was released from an Austrian prison after serving 13 months for the offense of "holocaust denial", an offense which can land you in jail in a great many places but not yet in the USA, thankfully. Irving just happens to be the leading historian in the school of "new realism" with regards to the Nazis. His numerous works, including his 1000+ page "Hitler's War" are really the gold standard in Nazi era history. In a nutshell, the "new realism" view of the Nazis is as follows: The Nazis, who were to a man soldiers of Imperial Germany, were part of an army that was undefeated on the battlefield. They had defeated the Russians and were in the process of doing the same to the Italians. Their navy was undefeated. They were in no danger of defeat on the Western Front, even with the arrival of the Americans. But on the German homefront there was Red Revolution, beginning in factories and then spreading to the fleet. The Kasier's generals felt there was no choice but to seek an armistice and to bring home the "reliable" divisions from the front, those untainted by Marxist and Bolshevik agitation to suppress the revolution, or else Germany would go down the same path that the Bolsheviks had taken Russia. The army did prevent a Bolshevik style revolution, though this was not completely decided till 1923. In the aftermath of all of this there arose among the defeated German veterans the idea that they were "stabbed in the back" by the German communists and that the Jews, especially the newly arrived Jews from the East, were in the vanguard of this treason. Out of this great misfortune arose the Nazis and the rest of the extreme right and here likewise arose the extreme bias against the Jews. When the Nazis came to power in 1933 Stalin was just beginning to consolidate his power and it was the belief of the leading Nazis that all of Europe would soon be at war with the Red Army and that it was "their duty" to save the world from Bolshevism, regardless of the cost. And Hitler may have been right. What really stopped Stalin after the Nazi defeat was the threat of nuclear weapons. By the time the USSR had produced a nuclear weapon the US nuclear force was vastly superior. Anyway, the idea is to understand the Nazis and the other fascists and to try to understand what made them act as they did. To dismiss them as merely "evil" or "insane" or any of the more emotional resolutions of the fascist era is useless. Hitler surely wasn't insane and to those who knew him he was anything but evil. It is a very interesting subject. Slagle