SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (12870)12/23/2006 5:30:38 AM
From: Crimson Ghost  Respond to of 218135
 
The Schindler of China - how expatriate Nazi became the 'Bodhisattva of Nanjing'
July 30, 2006

Clifford Coonan

There was chaos on the streets of Nanjing in December 1937 when Japanese troops stormed the Ming Dynasty walls of what was then the capital of China, bent on the slaughter still known as the "Rape of Nanking".

Thousands of Nanjing residents were killed by the Japanese army, but for some, a saviour was at hand - a paid-up member of the Nazi party who offered refuge in the garden of his comfortable, grey-bricked house near the city university and ultimately helped save the lives of more than 250 000 people.

John Rabe led a group of western missionaries, businessmen and scholars in draping Red Cross flags painted on sheets around a 2km by 3km area of the city, which was then known as Nanking. The quarter of a million people who were able to get inside the safety zone survived - another 300 000 people outside the international safety zone became the victims of the Nanking Massacre.

With his swastika armband, Rabe seems an unlikely or even impossible hero, but his personal courage and the selfless way he administered the safety zone means that, for many people here, he remains "the living Buddha of Nanjing".

His story is soon to be turned into a Hollywood movie. And since last year, Nanjing University has started to turn Rabe's house into a memorial, with support from his former employer, Siemens. It is due to open to the public next month.

The Japanese ground assault began on December 10 and the city fell three days later, signalling the start of the six-week-long "Rape of Nanking". The Chinese say 300 000 people died, although the Japanese insist the figure was lower. Witnesses say Chinese captives were tortured, burnt alive, buried alive, decapitated, bayoneted and shot en masse and up to 80 000 Chinese women and girls of all ages were raped and many more murdered or forced into sex slavery.

The incident has left enormous psychological scars in China and remains a huge stumbling block in relations between Beijing and Tokyo even today, as the Chinese believe Japan has not done enough to atone for its militarist past. This gives a political dimension to why Rabe's actions are being highlighted at the moment.

Rabe's account of the Nanking massacre in his 1 200-page diary is extremely moving and detailed, and despite having been lost for many years, it has become a key historical account of the time.

"If I had not seen it with my own eyes, I would not have believed it. They [Japanese soldiers] smash open windows and doors and take whatever they like… I watched with my own eyes as they looted the café of our German baker, Herr Kiessling," he wrote.

Japan was Germany's ally and Rabe often resorted to waving his swastika armband in the face of a difficult Japanese soldier to try and get his way. The United States was not yet at war, although tensions were emerging, and Rabe describes how all the foreigners were nearly killed on many occasions.

In one case, some Japanese troops broke into the settlement to attack the women there.

"We few foreigners couldn't be at all places all the time in order to protect against these atrocities. One was powerless against these monsters, who were armed to the teeth and who shot down anyone who tried to defend themselves," Rabe wrote.

There were Chinese soldiers among the refugees and the Japanese forced their way in to arrest them.

"Of the perhaps 1 000 disarmed soldiers that we had quartered at the ministry of justice, between 400 and 500 were driven from it with their hands tied. We assume they were shot since we later heard several salvos of machine-gun fire. These events have left us frozen with horror," Rabe wrote in his diary.

Fu Bin, from the university's history department, shows me the sections of walled garden where 650 people lived, huddled as refugees within their own city, where Rabe handed out rice and beans to the people who found sanctuary within his walls.

"Five families lived in the house itself, and many more lived on the grounds," he says, pointing to the gardens surrounding the handsome house.

Fu was one of three historians who went to Germany this year to meet Rabe's grandchildren and others who knew him, and to collect relics and files for the museum.

Some of the artefacts held by his grandchildren, now living in Heidelberg and Berlin, are astonishing - beautiful jade necklaces and Chinese dolls.

The intimate sepia photographs of this bastion of the German community and his family are a touching testament to expatriate life in the 1930s. But his descendants cherish the memory of what their grandfather did most of all.

The parallels with Oskar Schindler, the entrepreneur who saved the lives of 1 200 Jews, are obvious, but Rabe is a more challenging figure. He joined the Nazi Party early on and was head of the local branch and does not seem to have doubted his Nazi beliefs.

Tang Daoluan, the director of Nanjing University's archive department, believes Rabe was essentially apolitical and only joined the party to get support for a German school he set up in Nanjing. For her, it was Rabe's humanity that moved her most.

"He is only a businessman, not a priest or a humanitarian worker. What he did here - protecting citizens of another country without regard for his own safety - went far beyond his duty. He was a good man who understood human dignity," said Tang.

The son of a sea captain, Rabe was born in Hamburg in 1882 and arrived in China in 1908, joining Siemens two years later. He worked in Beijing until November 1931 when the firm transferred him to its office in Nanjing, named China's capital under Chiang Kai-shek's Kuomintang. As the company's senior China representative he sold telephones, turbines and electrical equipment to the government.

Photographs show Rabe's ingenuity. An air-raid shelter he built in his courtyard in August 1937, when the Japanese air attack began, was covered with a swastika flag to dissuade attackers.

By 1937 it was clear the Japanese were coming and the foreign community and much of Nanjing's Chinese population, including the government, evacuated the city in November.

Rabe sent his family back but refused to go himself, instead staying behind with several dozen other foreigners to set up the safety zone. Shortly before the Japanese arrived, Rabe was elected chairman of the 15-member Committee of the International Safety Zone.

"He was reluctant at first and concerned about the safety of his family; but as soon as he took the position, he shouldered the responsibility and didn't turn back," said Tang.

Huang Huiying has written a biography of Rabe and interviewed many survivors of the period.

"A survivor told me Rabe once bought horsebean to cure people suffered from beri-beri in his house, otherwise the disease may cause plague; and he also gave a little money to kids who lived there when festivals came, so as to cheer them up," said Huang.

"Rabe was praised as a living Bodhisattva, or living saviour, by those survivors, which is really high praise in Chinese culture," she said.

Even at the time, his fame was such that 3 000 women from Jinling Women's University knelt by the roadside and kowtowed in gratitude to Rabe when he was finally forced to leave the city early in 1938.

After returning to Berlin, Rabe gave lectures about the massacre and tried to get Hitler to intervene. He was arrested and interrogated by the Gestapo for three days and told to shut up. He left for Afghanistan and then came back to Berlin to work for Siemens.

After the war, because of the implementation of de-Nazification, he lost his job and was kept alive by food parcels and money sent from grateful colleagues in China. He died of a stroke in 1950.

But one entry in his diary, around Christmas in 1937, sums up his motivation. He had received a Christmas card, in German and Chinese, from the refugees, thanking him.

"The best Christmas present I could ever have is to save the lives of over 600 people." - Foreign Service

sundayindependent.co.za



To: TobagoJack who wrote (12870)12/23/2006 6:35:23 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 218135
 
The Jews learned the lesson. The rest of the people did not. The person should not have allegiance to a place to the detriment of his wealth. If the place is no longer useful to acquire and protect wealth and conduct business: He must move on.

It is a democracy where you vote with your feet. The lesson for the Portugals of this world is: Keep your productive assets. Else it moves elsewhere. Also keep the money. Else it spreads more evenly.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (12870)12/23/2006 6:35:30 AM
From: elmatador  Respond to of 218135
 
The locals envy the moolah of the Jew and persecute them. But they forgot that while they are doing everything the nation-state wants them to do, the Jew is doing what is necessary. Hence the locals are left pennyless and the Jew continued to enrich themselves.

I am all for the Jew than for the locals. Not the Jew religious zealots. The Jew state of mind. The Jew is the archetypal spreader of capital. Had the nationalists Brazilians not kick them out, they’d have created a NY in the Northeast of Brazil rather than where it it is now.



To: TobagoJack who wrote (12870)12/23/2006 12:54:27 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 218135
 
how far back do we go to determine cause and effect, morally right and spiritually wrong?

If the actors in the past are dead and gone, I would cut off the past and look at the present. This is because I am an individualist, and believe in individual culpability, rather than ethnic culpability, or tribal culpability, or any other form of group culpability.

Given the fact that the ancestors of today's Israelis began purchasing land in erstwhile Palestine in earnest in the 19th century, which accelerated during the early part of the 20th century, culminating in the 1947 UN partition, why look back to the days when the Romans threw the Jews out of Israel? Why not look to the 1947 UN partition?

Surely you are not arguing that the UN did not have the moral or legal authority to divide these former possessions of the defunct Ottoman empire?

Thus, the Israelis (not all of whom are Jews -- many are Christians and Muslims) are fighting to retain land which was legally ceded to them three generations ago.

And, given that 1947 was almost 60 years ago, how many of today's Palestinian suicide bombers were alive in 1947?

I think the answer is zero.

The Palestinians aren't fighting about turf. If it was just about turf, they'd have settled it long ago.

They're Arabs. There is no Arab nation on earth where Jews aren't treated like dirt.

They hate Jews because their religion tells them to hate Jews, and thus, they can't tolerate living in the same land as Jews. See, e.g., Saudi Arabia, where Jews are not tolerated, period.

There are fewer than 1,000 Jews living in Egypt. There are fewer than 100 Jews living in Iraq. Less than 100 Jews in Lebanon. Almost no Jews left in Syria. These are countries which formerly had sizeable Jewish communities, aggregate numbers in the hundreds of thousands, maybe millions.

It's not just Arabs. After the Islamic "revolution", 85% of Iranian Jews migrated elsewhere.

Someone upstream made the analogy that Jews are like the canaries in the coal mine. If the civil rights of Jews are not respected, the civil rights of other minorities will not be respected soon, and the civil rights of the less populous members of the majority are not far behind.

If minorities don't have civil rights, then nobody does, because, in that case, "right" comes from power, not law.