SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (317045)12/23/2006 9:57:55 AM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1574270
 
Well, I actually agree with no death tax for inheritances of up to $2M or so, increasing every year by the inflation rate. That allows a middle to upper middle class family to save all their life and give their kids a chance to go even farther. But more than that and we should adopt a progressive tax that gets steeper as the inheritance gets larger, topping out at 50% or so. Then use the increase in tax revenues to cut taxes for the middle class and poor. That will help create a recirculation of wealth from the top back to the bottom.

I'm very unRepublican when it comes to taxes. I definitely believe in taxes the super-rich and cutting taxes for the poor and middle class, as a solid way to ensure a thriving middle class and class mobility. I think that is essential for a thriving Democracy.



To: steve harris who wrote (317045)12/24/2006 12:24:22 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574270
 
"Seems to me the problem is the death tax isn't being given back to the poor."

It doesn't matter. Attempts at wealth evening universally fail. Those who receive wealth supplements always fall behind again. Robbing the middle class to give to the lower middle class is not effective.