SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy who wrote (317218)12/24/2006 2:51:25 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576364
 
If it's "victory" Elroy, why are we STILL there, dying in greater numbers than we did in the invasion? Your definition of "victory" seems pretty lame.

If ONLY the Iraqi opposition would march out and meet us on the battlefield, like MEN! They just don't fight the invaders of their country FAIRLY! They aren't following Elroy's RULES..

You were having your diapers changed then, but we "won" every military engagement in Vietnam too. But the result was..



To: Elroy who wrote (317218)12/24/2006 3:05:27 PM
From: SiouxPal  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576364
 
When you wonder why we will never win in Iraq you may want to study our Revolutionary War.
You'll learn some things about being invaded by another country for their greed.



To: Elroy who wrote (317218)12/29/2006 2:37:18 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1576364
 
The question was whether or not the US military was "invincible". I think it is.

According to Webster's:

invincible: incapable of being conquered, overcome, or subdued

The US Army sure in Iraq sure looks "subdued" to me.