SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jbn3 who wrote (59600)12/25/2006 10:40:02 PM
From: jeftuxedo  Respond to of 213182
 
jbn3

That spewer is not worth bowing out over. I have benefited from reading your posts and I am sure that there are others who feel the same way. We need more posters such as yourself and less of the "spewers", "squirters" or whatever their ilk should be labeled. Unfortunately, he wins when he drives off sensible posters such as yourself who contribute in a positive way. He doesn't deserve that satisfaction. Actively practice your own personal version of the "ignore" function and do not respond to this disruptive poster. To that end, if we would all just ignore the hell out of this guy he wouldn't have anybody left to argue with. By now, I am at the point that when I see his name on the post I just hit "next." Stay on board and continue to add value to the thread. TIA for considering this.

Jef



To: jbn3 who wrote (59600)12/26/2006 12:24:44 AM
From: Stock Puppy  Respond to of 213182
 
FWIW

The most # recs for a single post on this board Nov & Dec:

14 Message 23123908

second place is

8 Message 23083311

and third is:

6 Message 23128629



To: jbn3 who wrote (59600)12/26/2006 8:04:12 AM
From: IHateSourCream  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 213182
 
>>(no need to ban me, Mr. Moderator, I don't plan to return)<<

I wouldn't worry about getting banned. It appears our moderator (who does not ignore KIS but responds to his posts, thereby feeding the fire) doesn't intend to ban anyone on this thread -- even when warranted. Being a moderator in name only (with an unwillingness to take action) is somewhat meaningless.