Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (25118)	12/27/2006 8:49:36 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

<NONE of his "teachings" are original. That is a FACT.> That's your opinion without support, but that has never stopped you before. <Your puerile insults simply niggle the discussion.> If insults 'niggle' discussions... you're the KING niggler! LOL <Evidence shows this to be impossible> Again, without support your giving your opinion, clearly much of the world disagrees with you. You continue creating facts in your own head out of your opinion... which is fine, people do it all the time... dogmatic religionists for instance. <It proves that such an assertion is baseless and has no evidentiary support--DUH! In logic> It proves that the assertion is baseless and has no evidentiary support if there is none... it does NOT prove an assertion false. DUH! 8th grade science. <any ONE instance is sufficient to invalidate a factual claim.> That's right... which is why some famous logicians believed science was best off simply trying to negate things. It is also why you haven't proven any assertion that Jesus didn't exist, and no one is likely to, because you can never prove that all scenario's of possible existance have been exhausted. Which brings us full circle... some folks just can stand the possibility he might have been real... go figure. DAK